User talk:83.151.234.210

Joan Ryan
Source does not mention "Joan Ryan", state "overlooking golf course" Jim1138 (talk) 09:18, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

The source confirms that Ms Ryan lives in the affluent west of Enfield, far away from her core support in the relatively deprived eastern areas of the borough. She or her staff have and continue to campaign by saying she lives among her voters. Her home on Old Park Avenue EN2, does overlook Bush Hill Golf club, please look on any map to assure yourself of this. I have no desire to present her address on Wikipedia. Best wishes

The source does not mention her nor her "overlooking a golf course"

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Joan Ryan. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 10:51, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

The document referenced produced by Enfield Council clearly shows that Joan Ryan lives in the more affluent western section of the borough. This is factual, well sourced information. Please do not remove it again.

May 2017
Your recent editing history at Joan Ryan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 15:19, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 15:39, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Edit warring at Joan Ryan
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:24, 16 May 2017 (UTC)