User talk:83.163.84.58

Dear .....,

William of Soissons did not proof the explosion. You can find the argument therefore on the page of William of Soissons. Also it is not proven that the explosion does not exist. Therefore it seems to me better to say that "William of Soissons tried to proof the explosion."

The argument of William of Soissons was rejected in the 15e century by a school of Cologne. In the 19e century it was mathematised by C. I. Lewis. Boole, Frege and Russell accepted the argument of the explosion as proven. But it can be shown that the "proof" is not correct and must be rejected.

See also: Graham Priest, J.C. Beall, and Bradley Armour Garb, The Law of Non-Contradiction, Oxford, 2004, page 25.

Maybe your article can be adapted in this sense.

Kind regards,

Zevensprogen