User talk:83.233.95.166

March 2022
Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Concern (business), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Cassiopeia  talk  06:39, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Temporary work, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. 晚安 (トークページ) 08:57, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. JBchrch  talk  20:57, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Hello, I'm Mako001. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Moderate Party, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 08:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Christian Democrats {Sweden}. Here you deleted sourced text and replaced it with some website partnered with two casinos. Doug Weller  talk 09:47, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Your changes to Moderate Party
A party program is not a reliable source. That may seem paradoxical, but Wikipedia goes by secondary sources — not by what organizations say about themselves. If we were content to use self-description, every political party and every company would be angels on Wikipedia. Please see Reliable sources, and please don't edit war. Bishonen &#124; tålk 08:15, 18 May 2022 (UTC).
 * PS, also, your removal just now of well-sourced content at Liberal conservatism is disruptive. We go only by reliable sources, not by your own analysis of what "Moderate Party as of 2022" is like and why. See No original research. You need to slow down or be blocked. Bishonen &#124; tålk 08:20, 18 May 2022 (UTC).
 * This editor is clueless. Using a 2010 blog? Clearly has an agenda and needs blocking. Doug Weller  talk 09:45, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for a week for disruptive editing while ignoring advice, explanations and warnings. I see you were several times warned about original research in April as well. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; tålk 10:47, 18 May 2022 (UTC).

October 2022
Hello, I'm ButterCashier. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Malmö Redhawks, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ButterCashier (talk) 12:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC)