User talk:83.87.46.37

This [|article] appears to be written like an advertisement.

I wrote (added) pretty much about the process of manufacturing and liability issues when Macor ceramic is used without traceability back to an official distributor of this material in case of failing components or application in the properties section. I contacted the owners of website www.macor.info to asked if it was ok to link to there site to verify my write up and also linked to an official distributor page of the manufactures of Macor ceramic (Corning). In references there is already the brochure pdf of Macor, a linked picture of the maxi slab I put up and also a complete link to a commercial macor seller site that has been on there for over a year. I did not understand that when I linked to macor.info as a reference that is seen as an advertisement and that the other company website with no added value of information can stay there for over a year without any warnings? I have edited my write up to that it reads from a neutral point of view,as people suggested that I was/could be affiliated with maocr.info site. This is not the case, but found that information regarding other than the standard brochure was hard to come by to reference my personal findings when using this material over many years when working in this sector of industry even though there have been plenty of studies using this ceramic. As this is my first contribution to Wikipedia I am still learning, in this case really I have tried my best to understand the guide lines regarding references and adding text to articles in general. Technical ceramics (talk) 00:50, 12 September 2013 (UTC)