User talk:84.121.118.68

November 2018
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.

Entranced98 (talk) 22:15, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Factual claims
When you add claims such as that somebody now goes under such-and-such a name or that he was born on such-and-such a date, you must provide reliable sources for these claims. -- Hoary (talk) 14:35, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello 84.121.118.68, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Gerald Stano have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:41, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2019
Hello. Please do not add false information to Wikipedia articles, as you did with this edit to Scott Peterson. The source you cited does not say that the death penalty was "abolished" in California. If read the first line of that New York Times article, you'd see that it says "Gov. Gavin Newsom announced a moratorium on capital punishment on Wednesday, granting a temporary reprieve for the 737 inmates on the state’s death row..." Further down that article also says, "California voters have rejected an initiative to abolish the death penalty." Nightscream (talk) 15:26, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Pauline Nyiramasuhuko have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 18:12, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pauline Nyiramasuhuko. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 19:55, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Édouard Karemera, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 14:03, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2019
Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Ivan Frederick, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. w umbolo  ^^^  13:35, 5 July 2019 (UTC) the guy came out in the photos without a shotgun in the head--84.121.118.68 (talk) 15:04, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Peter Scully have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 19:58, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2019
Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Robert Berdella, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jalen D. Folf  (talk)  15:23, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Draft:Miyano Hiroshi concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Miyano Hiroshi, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:25, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Leslie Isben Rogge, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 15:00, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices. khe ??--84.121.118.68 (talk) 15:03, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Miyano Hiroshi


Hello, 84.121.118.68. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Miyano Hiroshi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 10:01, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Charles Graner.  General Ization Talk  02:19, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2020
Hello, I'm Donald Albury. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to History of Liberia seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Donald Albury 01:04, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
Thanks for contributing to the article Nawaf Ghazaleh ‎. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru  (talk)  14:04, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Hello, I'm Thepenguin9. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Ripper Crew—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks.  Thepenguin9 (talk''') 19:17, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Winner 42. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Human rights in Libya seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. W 42 19:19, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Hello, I'm David Tornheim. I noticed that in this edit to Ri Sol-ju, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --David Tornheim (talk) 10:42, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nawaf Ghazaleh, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 13:46, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nawaf Ghazaleh. Epistulae ad Familiares (talk) 13:47, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:35, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Sockpuppet investigation
Epistulae ad Familiares (talk) 10:34, 2 June 2020 (UTC) you are harassing me, you do not contribute anything to Nawaf Ghazaleh... --84.121.118.68 (talk) 14:17, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Given the evidence provided and the investigation conducted, I have blocked the account as well as this user for engaging in block evasion. For you to be able to continue editing, you will need to appeal your block with an administrator and discuss this matter. You can do this by responding here and adding  .  ~Oshwah~  (talk)  (contribs)   13:57, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
Hello, I'm Balon Greyjoy. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Peter Scully—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 15:58, 4 July 2020 (UTC)