User talk:84.21.151.208

February 2017
Hello, I'm Jackfork. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Hillsborough (film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jackfork (talk) 10:18, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm IdreamofJeanie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User talk:Jackfork have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 10:21, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hillsborough (film), you may be blocked from editing. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 10:22, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Islam and abortion. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Islam and abortion was changed by 84.21.151.208 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.872843 on 2017-02-27T15:02:06+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:02, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:06, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

March 2017
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Austria. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 10:42, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Waverton, Cheshire— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 14:26, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Art Deco. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. David J Johnson (talk) 21:30, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2017
Hello, I'm Rrburke. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Tampon— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Rrburke (talk) 10:43, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Xabi Alonso. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:39, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Max Harvey (December 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lacypaperclip was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Max Harvey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Max_Harvey Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lacypaperclip&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Max_Harvey reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lacypaperclip (talk) 12:02, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Battle of Waterloo, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Harmon758 (talk) 15:17, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Waterloo. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:21, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Battle of Waterloo was changed by 84.21.151.208 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.906919 on 2017-12-14T15:21:06+00:00.

Draft:Max Harvey concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Max Harvey, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Max Harvey


Hello, 84.21.151.208. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Max Harvey".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  18:12, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

September 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Reaseheath College. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AbhiMukh97 (Speak) (Contribs) 09:41, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2019
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Chester Zoo—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 12:53, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Chester Zoo. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 12:55, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Chester Zoo, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 12:56, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chester Zoo. CLCStudent (talk) 12:57, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to [ trigger the edit filter], as you did at Chester Zoo, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 12:58, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:00, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

December 2021
Hello, I'm Kent G. Budge. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Pleistocene have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.

March 2022
Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Ilısu Dam—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Isabelle 🔔 14:32, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Talk:Assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. >>> Ingenuity . talk ; 12:32, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Hello, I'm Redtree21. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to R. J. Palacio have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Redtree21 (talk) 10:36, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Pull-off, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wikipedialuva (talk) 09:53, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Piano pedals. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ButterCashier (talk) 09:53, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Millennium Dome, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 12:44, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

March 2024
Hello, I'm EnIRtpf09b. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Cardboard have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. EnIRtpf09b (talk) 13:30, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cardboard. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DoebLoggs (talk) 13:33, 7 March 2024 (UTC)