User talk:84.236.27.55

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the ones you made to Australians. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply  [ create a named account] . It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a minimum number of days and made a minimum number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (84.236.27.55) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! HiLo48 (talk) 02:54, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi, and thanks
Thanks for your hard work on the Australians article. Just as an aside, however, I had to change back the in text % you'd put in to the written word 'percentage' per the Wikipedia guideline WP:PERCENT. The symbol '%' is retained for the tables as, in that context, it is considered to be scientific data. Hope this helps! Iryna Harpy (talk) 06:20, 29 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the thanks. But I think you are mistaking a statement of fact that "percent" is commonly used with a recommendation that it should be preferred over "%", which is not what the guideline says or implies. In any case, when there are lists of figures in the body text, abstracted from statistical sources, I'd consider them scientific or technical data. I think it makes the data harder to comprehend when "percent" is used instead of the sign "%". There's a good case for presenting the data as tables, anyway. 84.236.27.55 (talk) 07:01, 29 December 2019 (UTC)


 * I'm just a stickler for MOS and didn't really think it through. I agree with you in this instance as it doesn't fit the spirit of the guideline. If you wish, I'm happy to self-revert. It's an impoverished excuse, but chemo brain is a real thing, which is why I'm sticking to ogreing. Thank you for the understanding... and a Happy New Year to you and yours!Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:50, 1 January 2020 (UTC)