User talk:84.236.52.194

September 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Onorem♠Dil 15:33, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

April 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Anti-fascism. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Off2riorob (talk) 17:09, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hexagram, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Hexagram was changed by 84.236.52.194 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2010-04-17T15:47:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:47, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

June 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Germanic mythology has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 19:01, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Made in China, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Vedant (talk) 16:26, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. (I am referring to this pair of changes which you made to the Hungarian language article.) Richwales (talk) 19:38, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Errm, excuse me? It's not original research. It's the truth from the other side - East. Be sure to watch theese two videos: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWPCVMEsyeM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sf-Q9rAieWU


 * "Truth from the other side" may be OK — but you must provide suitable sources for such material before you can use it here (see WP:V, WP:RS, WP:SPS, and WP:OR) — and the article as a whole "must be written from a neutral point of view, representing fairly, proportionately, and as far as possible without bias, all significant views that have been published by reliable sources" (see WP:NPOV). Deleting mainstream material (together with the sources backing it up), and replacing it with unsourced claims is not considered acceptable behaviour on Wikipedia.  If you can find sources of the proper quality (see the policy pages I mentioned above), you are certainly free to add material suggesting an alternative view (and say something like "an alternative view from Turkish scholars" or whatever), but this would have to be in addition to the existing material describing the mainstream scholarly conclusion.  These are core Wikipedia policies, and flagrant refusal to abide by them is likely to get you blocked from editing the site and deprive us of whatever constructive contributions you might otherwise have been able to make here.  Richwales (talk) 20:11, 5 June 2010 (UTC)


 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.