User talk:84.43.93.98

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Recent changes patrol

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you  [ create an account] . Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (84.43.93.98) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tridwoxi&action=edit&section=new my talk page], or ask your question and then place  before the question on this page.

Again, welcome! ~ Tridwoxi (talk) (contribs) 13:30, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Hello, I'm DoebLoggs. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gnome Alone have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. DoebLoggs (talk) 15:08, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * Thanks, but be more careful, I was reverting vandalism! 84.43.93.98 (talk) 15:09, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gnome Alone. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DoebLoggs (talk) 15:09, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * STOP PUTTING BACK THE VANDALISM! 84.43.93.98 (talk) 15:10, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
 * You are right, my bad. DoebLoggs (talk) 15:12, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Big ears, you may be blocked from editing. TheFrog001 - Talk to me! 15:19, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Sigh. Check again 84.43.93.98 (talk) 15:19, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Margaret John
Hi. I tried replying via the link in the notification that I got about your deletion of my contribution but it takes me to a page that says Wikipedia does not have a user page with this exact name, so I hope this is the right place to contact you. Are you absolutely sure it isn't her? I was merely amending and expanding on an entry that had already been made to say that she took part, so there doesn't seem to have been an issue about it before. Have you watched the programme? It's only available for another 24 days, unfortunately, but it sure looks and sounds like her, so it must be an amazing coincidence if it isn't her. True, the programme page doesn't name her, but I'm sure you must realise that she wouldn't have been named, since she was 'only' a contestant and contestants don't get named in credits. I included the https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m001l4r5/lily-savages-blankety-blank link so that people who were able to could see for themselves if and while possible. Cybersub (talk) 21:14, 6 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I am not sure how you can include false information here based on someone thinking someone else looks a bit like an actress! Where's the actual source? "Amazing coincidence" doesn't cut it, there are plenty of people who look similar, and the programme link doesn't help establish that it is her, just someone that looks (a bit) like her. Find a reference that says it's definitely her! (There isn't one :p ) 84.43.93.98 (talk) 15:34, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply. As I pointed out, contestants don't get credited and there didn't appear to be a prior issue highlighting her involvement, so it already seemed to be established and accepted. I don't believe it is false information; that's your belief :p You may think the contestant looks a bit similar; I beg to differ. I wish I could find a definitive source, but in the absence of one then I guess I'll have to let it slide. Cybersub (talk) 16:45, 11 April 2023 (UTC)