User talk:84.55.19.40

Frank and Edwin
Hi. Neither Frank nor Edwin are close to being notable enough to be mentioned in an encyclopedia as neither have received coverage in independent sources, let alone significant coverage in independent sources. You've already been challanged on this insertion, see WP:BRD. Wikipedia isn't for promoting one's friends. – Thjarkur (talk) 11:17, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi.

1) They are not my friends 2) They both have been covered in several independent sources (Medium, Tennessean, etc.) 3) Wikipedia is not to cover only presidents.

I still can't understand why do hoaxes in Wikipedia last for years and nobody cares about them but the facts become reverted, deleted and so on. Edwin Symonowicz is the most famous resident from Dolina Jadwigi. Dolina Jadwigi also had not received coverage in independent sources, so, maybe it's also uncredible and should be deleted from encyclopedia? --84.55.19.40 (talk) 12:58, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Hoaxes and non-notable content is removed once someone notices it. Dolina Jadwigi is a human settlement, which makes it one of the few things Wikipedia considers to be automatically notable enough for inclusion. Medium is user-generated (so it's not a reliable source), Edwin hasn't been mentioned in any reliable sources. – Thjarkur (talk) 13:03, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * But why then several Wikipedia articles about cities and settlements provide lists of the people not known and not mentioned in any reliable sources and no one reverts them? You don't need to search very much, take any Polish city, for example, Jaslo: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jas%C5%82o#Notable_people. It mentions Ralph Kaminski - the singer I've never heard about who has even less web links than Frank Mortenson or Edwin Symonowicz - ticket selling sites, Amazon, Discogs, Twitter, Facebook. Frank Mortenson also has ticket selling sites, Amazon, Discogs, Twitter, Facebook, but can't be mentioned nowhere in Wikipedia. So, why and what's the difference? --84.55.19.40 (talk) 13:21, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Post scriptum. In WP:USERGENERATED I've read that review aggregators can be treated as reliable sources. So, for the next time, I will mention Frank Mortenson in article "Strangers in the Night" and provide his Last.fm profile to assure everyone that he's credible. Then it will be clear and in harmony with Wikipedia policies. --84.55.19.40 (talk) 13:35, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * See WP:RSP and scroll down to Last.fm, it is not usable as a source. Many of our articles are imperfect and are improved randomly when editors notice something that can be improved such as removing non-notable people from a list. pl:Ralph Kaminski on the other hand appears fairly notable as he's recieved significant coverage and charted nationally. People without a Wikipedia article are usually removed from these types of lists, WP:WTAF. Neither Frank nor Edwin are notable since independent sources haven't covered them. – Thjarkur (talk) 14:13, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Again, please stop trying to insert these people to Wikipedia. When they do become notable, someone who is not related to them will eventually write about them. – Thjarkur (talk) 23:24, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The problem is that, based on the history of these pages, I see several IP addresses which don't belong to me and you still revert them only because they want to include Frank Mortenson. It's great that we solved this problem on the page Strangers in the Night deleting the whole section, but there are several well-known recordings of NOTABLE SINGER Frank Mortenson who received his INDEPENDENT RELIABLE COVERAGE. Already I've even provided the very specific link on what you call "coverage in independent sources" but, based on your opinion, it's still bad. Frank Mortenson is one of the greatest Polish and European singers. No matter on that, OK, I will stop it, but other people will do it again and again if they are Mortenson's fans. There are thousands of these fans and I am only very and very one from them all. I have only one IP and promise that I won't do that anymore. --84.55.19.40 (talk) 23:46, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Edits
Again, please don't just reinsert edits you've already been challanged on. See WP:BRD and WP:WTAF. Your friend is quite far from being notable enough for Wikipedia. – Thjarkur (talk) 22:38, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Several people don't have any articles on Wikipedia and still have right to exist in references. Edwin Symonowicz is one of the most notable Polish artists ever, he raised young teenage stars like Roksana Wegiel and Viki Gabor. And I don't and won't believe he's "quite far from being notable enough". If I would not have written an article about Frank Mortenson, you would never know and see him. But now, again and again, I'm making and making references, notable, reliable references (now even started referencing books), and still bad. The problem is that you're not from Poland. But I'm Pole, and I perfectly understand what does Symonowicz mean for our country. As I said before, I have only one IP. But when I started noticing other people including Symonowicz into the page, and you keep reverting them, I returned and continued doing my job - including famous, well-known singer into Wikipedia, an encyclopedia which's self-proclaimed to be "free". The quote that Symonowicz is "quite far from being notable enough for Wikipedia" is nothing more than your opinion. I may think the same about Greta Thunberg or Billie Eilish, but an opinion remains an opinion. We have facts, we have references, and, what's the main thing, we have notable, reliable references: Vilnius University site, Ajman University Library. Is the reference to Ajman University Library with all Symonowicz's works NOT ENOUGH? It's enough. It's absolutely enough for one sentence about him on his native village's page. 84.55.19.40 (talk) 01:12, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard
Please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User determined to add their non-notable friends to articles – Thjarkur (talk) 12:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I obey the Wikipedia principles and the words of moderators. I don't have to obey anyone else. --84.55.19.40 (talk) 13:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
 * At all, I agree that's not a bad thing. Let's wait for response of administrators. --84.55.19.40 (talk) 13:51, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Hello, I'm Ts12rAc. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to 2022—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks.  Ts12rAc talk to me 18:32, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Hello, I'm Gatemansgc. An edit that you recently made to Maxima Group seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Gatemansgc (TɅ̊LK) 22:38, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:Meters/Frank Mortenson LTA


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that User talk:Meters/Frank Mortenson LTA, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Meters (talk) 05:16, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Congratulations. You created this talk page again, and now you're blocked for another three months. We always appreciate it when LTAs jump up and down and yell "Here I am again!" Meters (talk) 05:31, 12 August 2021 (UTC)