User talk:85.1.63.220

September 2018
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Anna Kolesárová— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   09:46, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I am Tomas. I think the only thing on my edit that is not constructive in case of Anna Kolesárová is my english, which is not the best. So I would be glad if somebody would correct it. But I think the meaning of my changes are constructive. I don't know if you want to discuss it here, but I think it is legit to mention that from the side of the slovak state and especially the slovak catholic church in the time 1938-1945 there were tousands of russian "Anna Kolesarovas" which were raped and murdered by slovak soldiers. Not only that there is no beatification process planed, but the slovak church and state didn't even appologised for this crimes. To revert my edits is a clear profascist historical representation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:1205:5013:FDC0:3000:BBE8:CD21:3B2D (talk) 09:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. --Darwinek (talk) 23:07, 3 September 2018 (UTC)