User talk:85.109.70.3

November 2017
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Göle, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 11:10, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Göle, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. ''I know you disagree with the content, but the content has been properly cited from a reliable source. If you have more accurate information, please do edit it accordingly and state the source of the information. '' Optakeover (U)(T)(C) 11:14, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Göle
Climate-data.org is an accepted source. If you disagree, discuss on talk:Göle per wp:BRD. Wikipedia publishes what wp:reliable sources state, not just what "official" sources state. Please don't remove again. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 11:18, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 11:21, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Göle. Shellwood (talk) 11:24, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Again, take it to talk
See wp:BRD. Removal again will likely lead to a wp:block Jim1138 (talk) 11:31, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring, using more than one IP address. You have been told what ot do if you disagree with other editors about the reliability of a source, and "just keep posting your preferred version in the hope that other editors will eventually give up and you get your way by being more stubborn than anyone else" is not it. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 17:04, 11 December 2017 (UTC)