User talk:85.152.232.17

March 2024
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting, and then click the "Save" button. ''Hi, I actually kept up your edit, because it seemed like you were removing NPOV-violating material. Just remember to use the edit summary!'' Personhumanperson (talk) 13:02, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence, you may be blocked from editing. InDimensional (talk) 13:29, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Cinema of the United States. begocc questions? 08:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Hello, I'm Jake Wartenberg. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 17:15, 7 May 2024 (UTC)