User talk:85.164.230.64

stop adding promotional links. web-app.net will not be accepted as a link in the web application article. No examples will be included as there are too many examples and the list only will attract spam. --Sleepyhead 11:36, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Reply to Sleepyhead:

This is no promotional link, I don't even use the product in that site! BUT, it is a classical web-app external link example, and I guess this is why is placed in http://www.web-app.net

The argument "too many examples" is not consistent with your argument of "Spam". This link does not link to any commercial product whatever, the linked site provides Free open source product. These arguments are not relevant. If the majority do not want to include "web-app" in the article, discussion and links, please release this article link: Web-app. Otherwise, what is the point in making this article over inclusive?

Please note that the link submited is relevant for web-app discussion and actually existed before this article even started.

Thank you.

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Also, you're free to make an article on 'web-app'; just go to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Web-app&redirect=no and edit it. However, I suggest you go to WebAPP and edit that instead, as that is the actual name of the software. Veinor (ヴエノル(talk)) 02:30, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Veinor (ヴエノル(talk)) 02:35, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Reply to: Veinor

You still do not get it! You are refering me to two addresses that are ALREADY reserved to the article here with a redirect. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Web-app&redirect=no http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Webapp&redirect=no

This is like talking to a scratched LP, CD or whatever.

RELEASE these addresses if you do NOT intend to be SO INCLUSIVE or stop whining about it and BE INCLUSIVE! I have done nothing to Brunnock, except informing his site guests about his misconception concerning spam.

I added two changes here: 1.) Assuming that the redirect addresses: webapp and web-app are included, added to decription at start "also known as web-app". 2.) Added www.web-app.net link.

I see no rational reason whatever for you to remove these two changes. Kindly check changes again before deleting them also check your adviced links as your advices wont work there.
 * No, you don't get it. I am not going to pre-emptively 'release' those. You can edit either of those and remove the '#REDIRECT' section at the top of the page, thereby "releasing" them; note that I suggest you instead edit WebAPP, which is distinct from Webapp due to capitalization. And editing another person's userpage is usually vandalism. Veinor (ヴエノル(talk)) 14:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)