User talk:85.193.253.203

April 2021
Hello, I'm SunDawn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Wine—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. SunDawn (talk) 12:12, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello, This IP appears to be involved in a semantic war favouring the word suspects in the Ryanair Flight 4978 article. As we currently have no evidence to prove that the individuals arrested were suspects related to the bomb hoax and someone using this IP appears to be concerned that we cannot prove that they are merely passengers, I have replaced the word passengers, & suspects with journalists, as we do have ample evidence that this is something that the people detained and subsequently arrested are involved in.

Hello, I'm RenatUK. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Ryanair Flight 4978 seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Renat 12:42, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, I'm SunDawn. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ryanair Flight 4978, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SunDawn (talk) 06:51, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Poznań protests of 1956, you may be blocked from editing. Alex Bakharev (talk) 14:08, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Your recent editing history at 2021 European floods shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ... disco spinster   talk  14:44, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at M1 Abrams, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. -Fnlayson (talk) 13:02, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, I'm InvalidOS. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Armored bulldozer seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Invalid OS talk  16:16, 12 January 2022 (UTC)