User talk:85.196.176.223

Welcome!
Hello! I noticed your contributions to Totalitarianism&#32;and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! Dronebogus (talk) 17:35, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

GERB election summary
Hi, I noticed that you changed all the figures about the number of seats obtained by GERB in the past elections. I would like to remind you that in recent years GERB has run in coalition with SDS, and the figures you used refer to the whole coalition and not to GERB itself. I'm going to introduce back the correct figures, please don't change them back. Fm3dici97 (talk) 13:17, 6 June 2023 (UTC)


 * No, it's obvious that they are in coalition with the de facto non-existent SDS. This is mentioned on different occassions in the table summary. 85.196.176.223 (talk) 15:30, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Let me be clear about this:
 * Yes, it is mentioned in the table summary because, as it happens whenever a party runs in coalition with some other political movement, it s indicated in the election summary to clarify that the vote figures refer to the coalition as a whole. HOWEVER, the convention for what regards the seat count is to refer to the count for the individual party and not for the whole coalition. And this is a convention that regards not just GERB, not just the Bulgarian political parties, but the whole WikiProject about elections and referendums (feel free to check parties from whichever nation you prefer). This means that the party summary in the GERB page should contain the seat count referring solely to GERB, the party summary in the SDS page should contain the seat count referring solely to SDS, and a future party summary in the GERB—SDS coalition page would contain the seat count referring to the coalition as a whole. I'm restoring the proper figures once again, and please restrain from any further modification based solely on your personal perception on how active a party should be considered, thanks. Fm3dici97 (talk) 10:00, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
 * due to your insistence in engaging in what could be considered disruptive behaviours, and considering your lack of will to solve this dispute in your talk page, I've reported the case to the Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents to ask for their assistance. Here's the formal notification:
 * Information icon4.svg There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Fm3dici97 (talk) 16:24, 18 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Here's a link to the specific thread on the noticeboard Fm3dici97 references:
 * Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents


 * We operate by consensus using our content guidelines. Please see the article about Wikipedia's Five Pillars. The best place at this point to hammer out the correct approach is on the article talk pages where you can get other editors' opinions. Examples:
 * Talk:GERB
 * Talk:GERB—SDS
 * Talk:Revival (Bulgarian political party)
 * Sometimes you don't get a consensus on a talk page because not many editors see it or participate. In that case you can use the Requests for comment (RfC) process.
 * Finally, we have a Wikiproject consisting of editors working on Bulgarian topics:
 * WikiProject Bulgaria
 * You can publicize an RfC or ask for help at the project's talk page:
 * Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bulgaria
 * I hope these resources help. We appreciate your interest.
 * -- A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 21:06, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

July 2023
Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Emperor Meiji. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 14:30, 13 July 2023 (UTC)