User talk:85.200.213.250

August 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to North Face (film) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: North Face (film) was changed by 85.200.213.250 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.897705 on 2013-08-28T06:48:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:48, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to YG (rapper) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: YG (rapper) was changed by 85.200.213.250 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964187 on 2013-11-21T09:26:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:26, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

April 2014
Hello, I'm Quenhitran. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Michael Grant (young adult author) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ALittle Que nhi  ( talk to me ) 10:15, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Agenda 21 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Agenda 21 was changed by 85.200.213.250 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.850752 on 2014-11-20T08:50:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:50, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Agenda 21 with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. —Frosty ☃ 08:55, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. CT Cooper · &#32;talk 16:38, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Frosty. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Royal Albert Hall— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Frosty ☃ 10:47, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Royal Albert Hall with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. —Frosty ☃ 10:51, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. CT Cooper · &#32;talk 11:52, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

January 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at In the Name of the Father (film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Haminoon (talk) 11:19, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to In the Name of the Father (film) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: In the Name of the Father (film) was changed by 85.200.213.250 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.868114 on 2015-01-27T11:49:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:49, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at In the Name of the Father (film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Materialscientist (talk) 11:53, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. CT Cooper · &#32;talk 16:13, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gautama Buddha has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:21, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gautama Buddha was changed by 85.200.213.250 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.970336 on 2015-11-05T08:21:43+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Gautama Buddha‎, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. JimRenge (talk) 08:57, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Karsten has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:19, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Karsten was changed by 85.200.213.250 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954161 on 2016-05-23T11:19:15+00:00.

November 2016
Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Bergen Aquarium— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 11:42, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Squid as food has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:48, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Squid as food was changed by 85.200.213.250 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.885955 on 2017-01-19T11:48:05+00:00.

February 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Uluru has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:54, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Uluru was changed by 85.200.213.250 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950888 on 2017-02-01T07:54:16+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Uluru. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 07:59, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dav Pilkey have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:09, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dav Pilkey was changed by 85.200.213.250 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.974361 on 2021-03-08T08:09:47+00:00

April 2021
Hello, I'm Wham2001. An edit that you recently made to Malmö seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Wham2001 (talk) 10:27, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Namibia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Babegriev (talk) 08:08, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Namibia, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Namibia was changed by 85.200.213.250 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866274 on 2021-04-26T08:15:07+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:15, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to John Galliano. Jamesluiz102 (talk) 07:09, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

David Vestvik-Schutz
David Vestvik-Schutz is a great person and and is cool