User talk:85.255.232.36

February 2016
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to John Steinbeck— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 10:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to John Steinbeck, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. - the WOLF  child  10:41, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John Steinbeck, you may be blocked from editing. - the WOLF  child  10:42, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to John Steinbeck. Jim1138 (talk) 10:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 10:48, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

July 2017
Hello, I'm Caliburn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to University of Northampton— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --George (Talk &middot; Contribs &middot; CentralAuth &middot; Log) 09:47, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Hello, I'm Mélencron. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Conservative Party (UK) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mélencron (talk) 15:59, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Oliver Cromwell has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:29, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Oliver Cromwell was changed by 85.255.232.36 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.921498 on 2018-03-23T12:29:46+00:00.

August 2018
Hello, I'm ZH8000. I noticed that you recently removed content from Giessbachbahn without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Unexplained, irrational removal. ZH8000 (talk) 16:52, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * I did explain why. Perhaps you don’t understand plain English. 85.255.232.36 (talk) 16:54, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Giessbach Bahn shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Stop edit warring, stay with rational arguments on talk page. ZH8000 (talk) 17:33, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * Interesitng notice considering I have only made 3 revertsnin the last 24 hours. But you, my friend, have made ‘’4 reverts” in under an hour violating the 3 revert rule so off to ANEW we go to arrange your block. 85.255.232.36 (talk) 17:37, 16 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Both of you were edit warring. The reverting has stopped, so no further action will be taken, but just a general reminder all round that if you drag somebody to the edit-warring noticeboards, your own behaviour will also be looked at. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  12:37, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

October 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Chris Moyles Show has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:01, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Chris Moyles Show was changed by 85.255.232.36 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.877288 on 2019-10-14T08:01:19+00:00