User talk:85.255.234.59

April 2017
Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Peter Duffield have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:06, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2017
Hello, I'm Hayman30. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Azeem Hafeez— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hayman30 (talk) 07:33, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Edit warring
Your recent editing history at Dan Wagner shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Hayman30 (talk) 12:34, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Hello, I'm JimVC3. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Grêmio Foot-Ball Porto Alegrense have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. JimVC3 (talk) 00:25, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to FK Sūduva Marijampolė. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   00:29, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John Fleck (footballer), you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: John Fleck (footballer) was changed by 85.255.234.59 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959085 on 2017-11-16T00:37:09+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:37, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to John Fleck (footballer).  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   08:39, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

January 2018
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Paul Lambert, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Nzd  (talk)  11:06, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2019
Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Frank Meysman— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  14:42, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

August 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ata-ur-Rehman (cricketer), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 13:35, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

November 2021
Hello, I'm CuriousGolden. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Fifth grade have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. — curious  Golden  call me maybe? 21:06, 1 November 2021 (UTC)