User talk:85.255.235.62

November 2014
Hello, I'm Pinethicket. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kitchen witch, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 17:33, 8 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Did I miss something? I merely undid a reversion where no explanation was left in the edit summary as to why the material was removed.  The user in question has been reprimanded in a recent ANI for not leaving edit summaries as required by policy.  I am merely enforcing the ANI result. 85.255.235.62 (talk) 17:53, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

I have blocked you again, for 48 hours this time (and needless to say, this means that you are not allowed to edit through other IPs either, during this time). I find it hard to figure out whether you are just making this all up in order to troll or whether you are really blind to the idea of cooperative editing and pig-headed enough to actually believe what you're doing is right, but just in case, I'll spell it out to you once more: You are not allowed to use blanket reverts to "enforce" other people's adherence to things like consistent use of edit summaries. You can only revert something if you have a concrete reason to consider the edit bad, which means you have to actually check the edit and find that it is objectively harmful. There isn't a "policy" that people must use edit summaries, and there is also nothing to "enforce" over what the recent ANI thread said. You need to leave that editor alone. If you keep following him (or others) around, keep pestering or lecturing them about alleged policy violations or blanket reverting them without cause, you will be blocked again, and for much longer periods. Your entire attitude from what I've seen is deeply incompatible with the way Wikipedia is supposed to work; either you change your entire approach here or you will very soon find yourself not welcome in this project at all. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:40, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

June 2015
Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Gill Swerts, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 21:22, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gill Swerts with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 21:44, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gill Swerts with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Donner60 (talk) 21:52, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Skepta has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:24, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Skepta was changed by 85.255.235.62 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.899063 on 2015-10-24T15:24:54+00:00.

Recent edit to Skepta
Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person (Skepta), but that you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Mike1901 (talk) 16:11, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Skepta. Thank you. Hermionedidallthework (talk) 00:06, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Edit to Iris Recognition
A March 6, 2016 change attributed to you to the article on iris recognition replaced a paragraph by the simple phrase "porn stars". Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Iris-recognition. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Macchess (talk)

December 2016
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:Zzuuzz, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Mike1901 (talk) 21:12, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2018
Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I noticed that in this edit to Flip (acrobatic), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CASSIOPEIA (talk) 21:17, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

November 2019
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Mojave Desert, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CLCStudent (talk) 15:27, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2020
Hello, I'm Samf4u. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to East Cowes—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Samf4u (talk) 13:51, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

August 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Reba16 (talk) 23:47, 3 August 2021 (UTC)