User talk:85.255.237.91

December 2017
Hello, I'm Glane23. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Potions in Harry Potter— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 16:49, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

January 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Russell Slade. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 21:44, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

October 2019
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Paul Dacre, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Param Mudgal talk? 18:16, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alexander Curtis, you may be blocked from editing. - pivotman319 (📫) 10:35, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2021
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Milton Keynes has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. ''On this page, you changed a name to another name. However, in your edit summary, you claimed you were simply correcting spelling and grammar.'' Hillelfrei   talk   12:47, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Hello, I'm Struway2. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Eddie Howe have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Struway2 (talk) 08:21, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Texas Heartbeat Act, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. FULBERT (talk) 18:36, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Texas Heartbeat Act. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. FULBERT (talk) 18:37, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Third Watch. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Picard&#39;s Facepalm (talk) 17:30, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

November 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Apparent magnitude, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.   Squeakachu (talk) 22:13, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Apparent magnitude. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 22:14, 20 November 2021 (UTC)