User talk:85.31.129.252

Soap
Please read wp:soap and wp:forum. If you cannot abide by these this might not be the best place for you to edit.Slatersteven (talk) 12:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Also wp:spa, and wp:npa. Please stop making comments about users and make substantive and constructive suggestions, rather then tell us how crap we are. We are WP:NOTDUMB.Slatersteven (talk) 12:19, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

The one who is trying to steal the election (and failing) is Donald Trump himself. 2600:1012:B00D:844D:0:2E:84D0:F901 (talk) 00:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Maybe, but article talk pages are for discussing how to improve the article. What you or I think about the subject is not relevant.Slatersteven (talk) 09:53, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The reality is that Trump has 13 paths to victory vs. Biden's 10: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/gonna-get-real-real-soon-president-trump-still-paths-13-win-2020-election-biden-10/ ... I challenge you to watch what he says, in his own words: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=720O_yBLrTs (rather than what the censors at the legacy media SAY he says). These are facts he talks about, you can choose to continue living in your censorship-based highly controlled enslavement bubble, but I assure you it won't be comfortable for much longer, as your mind-controllers vastly overplayed their hand this time. The courts will decide, but will the media censor that too? Likely yes, and worse, they will try to ignite a civil war... will you be one of the low-information NPCs who will riot when they tell you to?
 * We go with what RS say, we do not do out own analysis.Slatersteven (talk) 17:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I know, that's WP's main rule, but I'm trying to reach YOU. You're not a robot who can't think for itself, are you? WP's "reliable sources" have been taken over by criminal elements, precisely because of how valuable the "official" narrative is (which is also why this should not be suprising). So ideally you'd look at the evidence presented by both sides, then conclude that censorship is wrong and dangerous, then try to warn your fellow experienced WP editors who are good people who don't really want to participate in censorship of all opposing views, even to the point of openly stealing an election in front of all of us (btw I'm not an American, the stakes aren't as high for me as they are for you if you're an American). You can take the NPC view of Jimbo Wales (under the mistaken assumption that the people in the legacy media are journalists reporting facts who already investigate things for you), or the self-respecting investigative approach of Larry Sanger... but WP won't tell you about Sanger's strong criticism of WP, of course.
 * ANd if I come to a different conclusion to you (and by the way, we have looked at a lot more then just your two sources), then what? This is why we do not allow OR, because not everyone see's things the same. If you cannot abide by that then you have no place here.Slatersteven (talk) 10:58, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The legacy media are also doing "original research", in fact they are political activists who are gaslighting their dumbed down NPC audience that still believe them, so it's fake OR. The other side, including "mainstream" sources that WP had as "respected mainstream publications" (as per WP:V/WP:RS) such as the NYPost that are now being censored, have honest OR that exposes the legacy media's criminality. If you arrive at a different conclusion, well, just make sure it's not because you haven't looked at both sides, which is very easy to foolishly avoid doing given the censorship of all opposing information (that exposes their crimes).
 * "legacy media"? what the hell does that mean?Slatersteven (talk) 17:32, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The MSM can't accurately be called "mainstream" anymore, as half of the country knows they are political activists who are trying to steal the election (this being only their latest crime, the corona-narrative is a bigger crime: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLpkIJdyLQM ). They are presented as many sources but they are ONE source who receive the same narratives (as you can see e.g. here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9R9oJZswV6Y ). Legacy/Big Media and their Big Tech billionaire activist friends claim that anyone who doesn't conform to their false enslaving narratives are bad people (racist/sexist/hate speech/etc) and must be censored, using "fact checkers" (censors) who are their fellow political activists "verifying" themselves (they are quite literally doing this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_stRRtPkvc0 ). You can see their censorship by doing a search for any "controversial"/political subject on e.g. Youtube and then the same search on an uncensored search engine using a "site:" search (which shows you organic results). They are the biggest liars in modern history. They used to only censor independent researchers ("original research") like you and me, now they're censoring right-wing legacy media/MSM too like the 200-year-old NYPost, as well as the president. Imagine right-wing media censoring president Obama... I'd be the first to call out such a disgusting anti-democratic act, and you should be too.
 * It is clear you are not here to build an encyclopedia, I have no idea if I have linked to any of these I now shall. Please read wp:rs wp:or wp:v wp:npa wp:not. If you continue to ignore these someone one block you.Slatersteven (talk) 10:10, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Building an encyclopedia citing exclusively corrupted left-wing sources who are censoring all opposing views, is not building an encyclopedia. It's building a psychological weapon against political opponents.
 * We do not.Slatersteven (talk) 17:32, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

You are clearly not here to build an encyclopedia. Bye. 2603:8000:A501:9B00:5DBF:E56B:67DC:2301 (talk) 15:36, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note this account has only edited this talk apge.Slatersteven (talk) 17:32, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

This is my last warning here, keep on with the above and I will report you.Slatersteven (talk) 17:33, 7 December 2020 (UTC)