User talk:85.76.67.254

January 2023
Hello, I'm Herbfur. I noticed that you recently removed content from ARM Cortex-A8 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Herbfur (Eric, He/Him) (talk) 03:42, 5 January 2023 (UTC)


 * On 14-15 March and 6 May 2022 many articles about ARM microarchitectures and chips were vandalized by IPs. In the case of the ARM Cortex-A8 it's very obvious as the FSB speed doesn't apply to the core, which is a semiconductor intellectual property core, and the SoCs using it don't have FSB either. Also the OC (overclocked) values shouldn't be used, as those are almost arbitrary and mostly irrelevant. Even if it weren't obvious, a look at the edit history of 191.253.15.209 and the other IPs that edited ARM-related articles on 14-15 March and 6 May 2022 should make it clear. 85.76.67.254 (talk) 04:05, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Now I see you have now reverted 191.253.15.209's vandalism by finding the correct(?) specs. Thanks. 85.76.67.254 (talk) 04:11, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, I think we've had a misunderstanding here. I reverted your changes because I was confused by your edit summary. Per WP:Vandalism, vandalism is a blatant and deliberate attempt to damage Wikipedia, with no good faith intentions at all - the edits appeared to me to possibly have been made in good faith, even if they weren't correct. As noted, I found the information and corrected it. Thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia, and I hope you'll stick around, let me know if you need any help! Herbfur (Eric, He/Him) (talk) 04:14, 5 January 2023 (UTC)