User talk:85.92.160.99

May 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to WaterAid has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:52, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: WaterAid was changed by 85.92.160.99 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.885735 on 2016-05-04T08:52:54+00:00.

September 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Central processing unit has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:22, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Central processing unit was changed by 85.92.160.99 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.863769 on 2016-09-08T13:22:16+00:00.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:13, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Hello, I'm Rrburke. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Leonard Bloomfield— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Rrburke (talk) 13:00, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shirin Neshat. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Tito Dutta (talk) 21:03, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2017
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 172.56.39.197 (talk) 13:23, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Stationers' Crown Woods Academy— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   13:04, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Ferdinand de Saussure, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 12:01, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2018
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Von Neumann architecture— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 10:22, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to John von Neumann. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 10:26, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Von Neumann architecture, you may be blocked from editing.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   10:29, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Metropolitan Police Act 1829. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Metropolitan Police Act 1829 was changed by 85.92.160.99 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953065 on 2018-10-05T09:19:44+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:19, 5 October 2018 (UTC)