User talk:85.92.191.224

June 2021
Hello, I'm SunDawn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Nottingham Forest F.C.—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. SunDawn (talk) 09:28, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been [ disallowed by an edit filter.] If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:29, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

February 2022
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Charles Piroth—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 14:17, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Charles Piroth. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 14:17, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello, I'm Melecie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Cambridge, Massachusetts have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. &#128156; melecie   talk  - 10:37, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Nokia 3310 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. >>> Ingenuity . talk ; 12:59, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nokia 3310. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. >>> Ingenuity . talk ; 13:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nokia 3310, you may be blocked from editing. >>> Ingenuity . talk ; 13:03, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nokia 3310. >>> Ingenuity . talk ; 13:03, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Your edit to Socialism has been reverted. Please see WP:NPOV and WP:CITE for why controversial statements need to be attributed and traced to citable sources. &mdash; The Anome (talk) 15:53, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Gizzverse


A tag has been placed on Draft:Gizzverse requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://cosmicmagazine.com.au/features/what-is-king-gizzard-the-lizard-wizards-gizzverse-does-it-really-exist/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk)  13:13, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

February 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Mike Perry (artist)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 11:38, 20 February 2023 (UTC)