User talk:85thday

Proposed deletion of 10th Anniversary


The article 10th Anniversary has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This article would seem to be premature. If this is all we know about the subject then it is better to delete the article. It can be recreated once more information is available which can be used as references.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DanielRigal (talk) 23:36, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 10th Anniversary


The article 10th Anniversary has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:CRYSTAL.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 03:25, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of 10th Anniversary for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article 10th Anniversary, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/10th Anniversary until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 16:05, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 10th Anniversary


A tag has been placed on 10th Anniversary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  ttonyb (talk) 19:34, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of WarDevil: Unleash the Beast Within


The article WarDevil: Unleash the Beast Within has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability, also WP:FUTURE.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Captain-tucker (talk) 20:37, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with WarDevil: Unleash the Beast Within
Hello. Concerning your contribution, WarDevil: Unleash the Beast Within, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://zombiegamer.co.za/war-devil-gets-green-light-and-name-change-to-project-kane. As a copyright violation, WarDevil: Unleash the Beast Within appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. WarDevil: Unleash the Beast Within has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:WarDevil: Unleash the Beast Within and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:WarDevil: Unleash the Beast Within with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:WarDevil: Unleash the Beast Within.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 21:32, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

WarDevil: Unleash the Beast Within
If you are interested, I see that a page about this subject is currently being edited at User:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry/WarDevil: Unleash the Beast Within. You are welcome to edit there. Please refrain from copying-pasting text into Wikipedia. It is a copyright violation -- therefore I have deleted your most recent article creation. If you have further questions, please ask. Good luck. — Cactus Writer (talk) 01:19, 19 November 2010 (UTC)