User talk:86.101.34.165

June 2024
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. These sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on rumors and personal opinions. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 20:21, 8 June 2024 (UTC)


 * MrOllie, thank you for your advice.
 * The data is from scientific report and valuable statistics source. We shall only attribute it properly.
 * I will change source links to the report (pdf, crossref published) on work days.
 * Have a nice weekend! 86.101.34.165 (talk) 21:13, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * If you would like to cite something that has been reliably published (like in a peer-reviewed journal), sure. But to be clear, no self published report from 'cdp.center' would be a usable source for Wikipedia. MrOllie (talk) 03:02, 9 June 2024 (UTC)