User talk:86.129.117.3

June 2020
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:W33dscoper. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox.   Ed6767 (talk) 22:18, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * Hi :) Which test edits? I am just talking to User talk:W33dscoper that's it.
 * Why did you delete all discussions I had with User talk:W33dscoper?! Who are you?!

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:48, 4 June 2020 (UTC)


 * This is the problem: You don't get it. You have been told multiple times, including by the person themselves (Special:Diff/960685359) to stop using the user's talk page for messages that are unrelated to the encyclopedia, and you have repeatedly, even after someone else removed them, violated this restriction. Harassment, including threats, intimidation, repeated annoying and unwanted contact or attention, and repeated personal attacks may reduce an editor's enjoyment of Wikipedia and thus cause disruption to the project.
 * Your contributions seem to be very focused on using Wikipedia as a forum, but Wikipedia is not a forum, and your edits are disruptive. See also Special:Diff/960632539: Wikipedia is not the place to tell people that you brush your teeth. If you would like to improve articles instead of endless talking, you should provide specific examples for future non-disruptive contributions.
 * ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:07, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Well I don't get it because what you are saying is simply unclear and the object vague and undefined. Please explain things more clearly and more specifically then we know what we are discussing about! All these discussions between users and me are in views of improving articles which I have done as you can see in my edit logs. If a particular user don't want to talk to me that is very fine but I am not aware this is the case. Which editor think he/she is harassed by me and does not want to talk any more with me please? If I don't even know which action is required from me what action shall I take? Be more specific please in what you don't want me to do with whom! Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.117.3 (talk) 23:20, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * There is exactly one action you should take: Start listening to those who tell you to stop talking. See Special:Diff/959572717, Special:Diff/959294288 for two more examples. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:21, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:54, 4 June 2020 (UTC)