User talk:86.130.22.29

I provided citation to changes to the Communist Party of Great Britain - Marxist Leninist regarding their self-stated antizionist position. I have also provided clarity to the page regarding its Stalinist position. While CPGB deny Stalinism exists and prefers to call itself "anti-revisionist" this is a sugar coated way of saying the party is Stalinist. I also stated the party ideology as antisemitism as CPGB support violent antisemitic organisations as 'comrades'. Undoing my work is edit warring and for me to be banned for that reason is outrageous.

July 2020
I provided citation to changes to the Communist Party of Great Britain - Marxist Leninist regarding their self-stated antizionist position. I have also provided clarity to the page regarding its Stalinist position. While CPGB deny Stalinism exists and prefers to call itself "anti-revisionist" this is a sugar coated way of saying the party is Stalinist. I also stated the party ideology as antisemitism as CPGB support violent antisemitic organisations as 'comrades'. Undoing my work is edit warring and for me to be banned for that reason is outrageous.

Hello, I'm Field Marshal Aryan. Your recent edit(s) to the page Communist Party of Great Britain (Marxist–Leninist) appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.    Field Marshal Aryan  ( talk ) 14:42, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Jamesrichards12345. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. James Richards (talk) 15:04, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. James Richards (talk) 15:13, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 16:44, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Philosophy Tube
Thanks for your edit to Philosophy Tube. However, I've reverted it in this edit with the edit summary Medium blogs are not reliable sources; critics should be professional and nationally or internationally known. If you have any questions, you can ask me on my talk page or ask another volunteer at the Teahouse. Thanks! — Bilorv ( talk ) 17:52, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Death of Shukri Abdi
Per [[MOS:WTW], my edit was intended to provide more context from the cited source in order to provide more balance. The school has not commented on whether the claims of Abdi's mother are correct. How can we not include this?!

Per MOS:WTW, your edit here to Death of Shukri Abdi is inappropriate and violates our policy on Biography of living persons. It is not appropriate to cast into doubt a person's statement without a secondary source. Instead we should simply report what was said and who said it, so far as secondary sources have described the situation. — Bilorv ( talk ) 18:03, 4 July 2020 (UTC)