User talk:86.131.69.208

Respell Chichester
Hi - I've reverted your good faith edit of a replell template to Chichester as I am not convinced the parameters are correct and lack of a edit summary and because an IP address is being used makes it harder for people to discuss this if challenged in the future. I have begun a discussion on the talk page. Thankyou.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Weymouth, Dorset, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 13:43, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Update of IPA with citation without citing source
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Dewsbury. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please do not update previously sourced content of pronunciations as you did at Dewsbury without explanation. It may your update, while possibly an improvement, is inconsistent with the original citation. Please indicate why you are doing shat you are doing with edit descriptions so people can following your reasoning and site sources. If you believe a cited source to be incorrect then please discuss on the article talk page first. ThankyouDjm-leighpark (talk) 20:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Infix Operator correction - (likely not vandalism)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Benazir Bhutto.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:05, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

My best understanding is -cum- (a Latin word in the original dictionary) not -come- and this would mean this 86.131.69.208's contribution was not vandalism, especially as the comment referred to the infix operator. In fact I believe the undo reverted incorrect content. Please note as the phrase in the article can be misinterpreted to an alternative meaning I have though it best to re-work it to avoid issues and add clarity to those for whom English may not be their primary language. Thankyou.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Djm-leighpark (talk) 15:46, 28 December 2017 (UTC)