User talk:86.136.152.179

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions&#32;so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply  [ create a named account] . It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (86.136.152.179) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  22:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Shading of both columns in cases of ties
Lately I've been thinking about how U.S. polling lists can change going forward (usually incremental differences between each election), especially in view of how they're still essentially following the same format as they were a decade ago with only minor differences. One of the things that I don't believe makes sense regardless is the non-shading of candidates in case of a tie – it's not that neither of them are leading, but both are the highest-polling candidates, so it would seem more prudent to shade both rather than neither (and leaving an unshaded row in the table when all others are shaded one way or the other). Mélencron (talk) 16:58, 24 February 2019 (UTC)