User talk:86.14.164.133

Your recent editing history at Catherine Blaiklock shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bondegezou (talk) 14:27, 22 March 2019 (UTC)


 * I second that. It is important to discuss these things, particularly when other editors disagree with you.  In addition, using primary references (URLs from Hope not Hate), is inferior to using proper independent third party references (from Guardian), per WP:RS. Everybody here wants to get the best article possible within WP:PAG, however, ignoring others will not achieve your aims. WP is a consensus-based project (with policies). Britishfinance (talk) 15:46, 22 March 2019 (UTC)