User talk:86.151.123.50

February 2019
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Shamima Begum, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 18:06, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Ok, fair enough. Sorry.
 * I'm sorry too. It was my error. Best regards. -- Baden-Paul (talk) 20:34, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

No worries. Thank you.

Shamima Begum
Please don't claim that her Bangladeshi citizenship is disputed. The UK can claim all it likes that she should be Bangladeshi, but that's just their opinion. If Bangladesh does not recognize her as a citizen then she is not. And as far as I can see the UK has not revoked her citizenship yet. Until they do she is still a UK citizen..If they have already done so then add a reliable source. Meters (talk) 20:42, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shamima Begum. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''Per WP:BRD you need to discuss this on the talk page rather than restoring your edit. '' Meters (talk) 21:16, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * Hi. I'll happily accept when I've been a prat (like I did above).  But I think you're being a little bit silly here.  I engaged with you rationally.  My edit was not unconstructive.  I left in place the part of your edit that I agreed with - the fact that she was British - and changed only the part of your edit that I honestly considered did not withstand logical analysis.  I then told you why it did not withstand logical analysis.


 * By all means disagree with me. And let's have an honest discussion.  But pretending I've been 'unconstructive' when I obviously have not is, well, rather unconstructive itself...86.151.123.50 (talk) 12:37, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Shamima Begum. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. w umbolo  ^^^  21:20, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * Hi, thanks for this. I think you've honestly misunderstood the situation.  I have not actually reverted anything.  I made one change.  Meters made a further change.  I did not revert back to my earlier version; rather I accepted the part of his change that made sense and was in line with the sources, and changed the part that I honestly considered was not.  I then fully explained why I thought the way I did.  If anyone has 'reverted' on that page, it is actually Meters, who made his initial edit 20:36 and then reverted back to it at 21:15.  So I'm a little surprised that you have warned me and not him.86.151.123.50 (talk) 12:37, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Talk page help
Noticed your comment at Talk:Shamima Begum. Hopefully this page will provide some guidance. S0091 (talk) 16:11, 24 February 2019 (UTC)