User talk:86.153.162.0

October 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Operations research, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yarrowfes21 (talk) 21:02, 26 October 2022 (UTC)


 * You clearly made a mistake (repeatedly) in not recognising that subjective adjectives describing a problem as 'complex' have no place in an actual encyclopaedia. You have also demonstrated your unfamiliarity with the range of problems addressed by Operational Research, some of which are complex, but many of which are not.  A problem need not necessarily be 'complex' to be the subject of Operational Research.  It simply needs to be addressable by the sorts of mathematics used in the field.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Operations research, you may be blocked from editing. Yarrowfes21 (talk) 21:08, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.