User talk:86.167.136.194

February 2021
Hello, I'm MichaelMaggs. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Impeachment, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. '' Please read the cited source which specifically provides this information. '' MichaelMaggs (talk) 10:23, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Impeachment, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that.   MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:36, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I have no idea why you keep removing the text relating to Henry Dundas. It is supported by a several reliable sources, and appears completely neutral and uncontentious. Please don't keep removing it with vague and unsupported statements like "biased". If you want to challege the accuracy of this, please post your proposals to the article's talk page, stating what you think the text should say, and which reliable source you reply on. I should mention, by the way, that original sources such as Hansard are normally not encouraged (anyway, the extract you pointed to was perfectly consistent with the statement in the article, being a record of an 1805 debate fairly early in the process). We prefer secondary, independent, reliable sources. You can read about them here. If you have questions about Wikipedia procedures, please ask.MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:51, 11 February 2021 (UTC)