User talk:86.17.26.17

November 2020
Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Magic Adventures of Mumfie. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with being blocked from editing, or other sanctions. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 17:49, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Tickle-U shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.None of those shows you keep adding ever aired on the block. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 01:56, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Johnuniq (talk) 04:17, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Aladdin and the King of Thieves, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:49, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Luxo Jr., you may be blocked from editing. credits Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:48, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Christmas Is Here Again, you may be blocked from editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 06:04, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Holidaze: The Christmas That Almost Didn't Happen. Geraldo Perez (talk) 06:08, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. GaiusTranquillusSuetonius (talk) 18:11, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:03, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Fantastic Mr. Fox (film). Immediate resumption after last block expired Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:24, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello, I'm Jusdafax. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Freddy vs. Jason—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Jusdafax (talk) 21:09, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer and the Island of Misfit Toys, you may be blocked from editing. Falsified credit info, resumed off 3 month block Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:32, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer and the Island of Misfit Toys, you may be blocked from editing. Resumed off 1 year block Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:54, 1 April 2022 (UTC)