User talk:86.170.34.216

October 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Prince Narula, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  15:17, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Prince Narula, you may be blocked from editing. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 11:53, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dipika Kakar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Mostwiki is not a reliable source and should not be used to source anything on Wikipedia. See identifying reliable sources for help in finding good sources. You cannot just do a random google search and use the first result that pops up, it must be a good source.''  Ravensfire  (talk) 17:17, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Saath Nibhaana Saathiya. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Diff:  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:29, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Shraddha Arya. Jessicapierce (talk) 20:40, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Suhani Si Ek Ladki have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Jessicapierce (talk) 20:40, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Iss Jungle Se Mujhe Bachao, Series One (2009) (October 27)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Iss Jungle Se Mujhe Bachao, Series One (2009) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Iss Jungle Se Mujhe Bachao, Series One (2009), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Iss_Jungle_Se_Mujhe_Bachao,_Series_One_(2009) Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Iss_Jungle_Se_Mujhe_Bachao,_Series_One_(2009) reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 06:11, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Cahk (talk) 08:59, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Dipika Kakar
Please stop spamming random users with requests to move this page. It's not helpful and disruptive. I left you a reply on one user page that you hit, I'll leave the same response here. Per the talk page, there's some contention about this move. It needs to be done through the controversial move process. Read that page and follow the instructions. It's a post on the article talk page, so you can start the process there. Thank you.  Ravensfire  (talk) 20:05, 1 November 2018 (UTC)