User talk:86.176.125.140

December 2022
Hello, I'm Mako001. I noticed that you made a change to an article, BloodRayne: Betrayal, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 23:43, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at BloodRayne: Betrayal. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 23:44, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at BloodRayne: Betrayal, you may be blocked from editing. — Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 23:45, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at BloodRayne: Betrayal shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 23:49, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at BloodRayne: Betrayal. — Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 00:05, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

New message from Mako001
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:BloodRayne: Betrayal. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 23:52, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 00:07, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.