User talk:86.176.212.11

December 2012
Hello, I'm Auric. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Transportation Security Administration because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Your edit also broke a number of image links. Please be more careful when editing. -- Auric 01:26, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I'm I am One of Many. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! --I am One of Many (talk) 08:59, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Auric. Your recent edit to the page Transportation Security Administration appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Auric 18:17, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors&#32; according to your reverts at Transportation Security Administration. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.-- Auric 19:22, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Transportation Security Administration, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Your crusade for some perceived grammatical rule against all editor consensus but more importantly against all sources will result in you being blocked from editing. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  02:07, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Acroterion   (talk)   14:35, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.