User talk:86.186.58.220

August 2018
Hello, I'm Thewolfchild. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to George S. Patton have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. '' Note: Please explain changes to articles with an edit summary. Per WP:BRD, once your changes have been reverted, do not revert them again, as that is considered edit warring. Continued edit-warring is disruptive and can lead to your access to Wikipedia being blocked. Instead, if your edit has been reverted and you disagree, go to the article talk page and discuss it. Thank you - the WOLF  child '' 17:59, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawk. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.''IP hopping isn't going to help. Either discuss the edit or leave it alone'' Meters (talk) 20:55, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia. Such attempts to avoid detection or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia '''you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Note: 217.42.217.151 also notified. - the WOLF ' child '' 22:02, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 15:32, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:86.186.58.220. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 15:33, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You are not allowed to remove the dynamic IP notice. See WP:BLANKING. Meters (talk) 19:22, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Army Air Corps (United Kingdom) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.And for that matter, on this page too. You are not allowed to remove the shared IP notice. Meters (talk) 19:22, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello
Hello our little Northern Irish friend. As you've by now noticed, your behaviour has caught the attention of several editors. Not just your disruptive editing to some of our articles, but also your IP-hopping and this... whatever you call this nonsense you're doing with this page. If you would like your own user talk page, that you can blank whenever you like, or store links to pages you've disrupted, or anything else (within guidelines) then I would suggest you register an account. That talk page would be yours, whereas this one is not. It is a the talk page of this particular IP address, that you just happen to have temporary access to for now. As I mentioned above, and you have already been advised, these talk pages are governed by guidelines. Guidelines that you are violating with your behaviour.

I'm not sure why you're acting this way, I suspect you're a youngster and you think this is fun (but I could be wrong). Well, even after you blank this page again (we know you will, you can't help yourself now), we'll wait. You will either get blocked, or switch to another IP, or just move on to something else. But this page will end up with the proper templates in place. As for notices and warnings, once you delete them, you are determined to have read them, and they are saved in the "old IP warnings" template, for a quick and easily accessible record of your (rather silly) behaviour here.

You know, some your edits do appear to be constructive. Why don't you just stick with that instinct and knock of all the immature stuff? Just a thought... Have a nice day. - the WOLF  child  20:15, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. - the WOLF  child  21:24, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

blocked for 1 month
Effective 14 August 2018 - - the WOLF  child  08:40, 17 August 2018 (UTC)