User talk:86.187.163.141

February 2024
Do not use multiple IP addresses to disrupt Wikipedia, like you did at Transmisogyny. Such attempts to avoid detection, circumvent policies or evade blocks or sanctions will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, '''you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 'Long-term abuse, block evasion by Special:Contributions/2A00:23EE:0:0:0:0:0:0/34.'' Binksternet (talk) 02:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Transmisogyny. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sideswipe9th (talk) 02:30, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * This has already been discussed on the talk page. 86.187.163.141 (talk) 02:33, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * 4 months ago, and it didn't find consensus. Rather than reverting the article to a state that multiple editors have undone, please make new arguments on the talk page for why your changes should be made to the article. Thanks. Sideswipe9th (talk) 02:35, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Consensus was reached by the critique of the edit having been addressed in a reply, and no further disagreement made in response. 86.187.163.141 (talk) 02:37, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * After the edits were reverted, there is once again no consensus. I'd also disagree that there was any consensus reached in the last discussion in October. If there was, the content would have been included at that time. Sideswipe9th (talk) 02:42, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Please self-revert your most recent restoration, and engage on the article's talk page with new reasoning for why the changes should be incorporated into the article. Thanks. Sideswipe9th (talk) 02:43, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks but, please could you address the existing reasoning made already on the talk page, if you disagree with this edit? Rather than reverting again. 86.187.163.141 (talk) 02:45, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I did in my original edit summary. That content is not NPOV compliant, as the balance of sources do not describe transmisogyny as controversial. Sideswipe9th (talk) 02:46, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I disagree, as reverting this disregards reliable sources from the radical feminist perspective that dissent from Serano's viewpoint. Perhaps instead, there is a better way of wording this? Please consider suggesting an alternative on the talk page. Thank you. 86.187.163.141 (talk) 02:50, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for block evasion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 02:52, 29 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Was 2A00:23EE:0:0:0:0:0:0/34 - the entire address range for UK-based mobile ISP EE - really blocked for making disputed edits to the Transmisogyny article? That seems implausible. Please unblock. 86.187.163.141 (talk) 02:57, 29 February 2024 (UTC)


 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.


 * I see a sequence of edits that are the same, the recent ones made by UK IP 86.187.163.141, and earlier ones made last October by UK IPs Special:Contributions/2A00:23EE:1688:C200:8903:AB4B:72B0:46B3, Special:Contributions/2A00:23EE:1610:554D:CDAC:EE4F:BA6E:A94, Special:Contributions/2A00:23EE:16B0:41D4:F479:2E69:420:405B and Special:Contributions/2A00:23EE:15C8:8B77:B446:8C15:E1F0:39B3. The UK range has been blocked for long-term abuse, hence the "block evasion" conclusion. Binksternet (talk) 04:08, 29 February 2024 (UTC)