User talk:86.19.222.221

August 2023
Hello, I'm Maurice Oly. I noticed that you recently removed content from British Rail Class 730 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not remove content without providing a source for the change. Maurice Oly (talk) 12:25, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
Hello, I'm Maurice Oly. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, British Rail Class 730, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Maurice Oly (talk) 14:52, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
Hello, I'm Maurice Oly. I noticed that you recently removed content from British Rail Class 730 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Maurice Oly (talk) 18:49, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at British Rail Class 730, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Danners430 (talk) 18:56, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Soho TMD—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Jalen Folf  (talk)  02:49, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at British Rail Class 730, you may be blocked from editing. Danners430 (talk) 18:28, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Alstom Aventra. Materialscientist (talk) 02:45, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Alstom Aventra. Danners430 (talk) 18:29, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Danners430 (talk) 21:48, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Chase Line‎. —Bruce1eetalk 08:19, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Block
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 5 days for disruptive editing that concern long term problems compounded by poor communication. Unresponsive to multiple warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. El_C 13:44, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Maurice Oly. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, West Midlands Trains, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Maurice Oly (talk) 19:07, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at British Rail Class 730, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Danners430 (talk) 09:56, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at British Rail Class 730, you may be blocked from editing. Danners430 (talk) 08:02, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Lack of communication
@86.19.222.221 You are still consistently making edits against community consensus, and are refusing to engage on talk pages. Please respond to concerns raised in talk pages instead of pushing your point of view and edit warring - communication is mandatory, and it one of the main reasons you were blocked in January. Danners430 (talk) 17:02, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
Your recent editing history at British Rail Class 730 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Danners430 (talk) 07:23, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
Your recent editing history at British Rail Class 730 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''The reasons for the reversion were explained in edit summaries. Do not keep re-adding the same links over and over again. If you think they should be added, take it to the talk page and discuss with Redrose.'' Danners430 (talk) 17:55, 17 April 2024 (UTC)