User talk:86.195.143.180

Your statement that the judge "characterized the requested remedy to disqualify the votes as "unhinged." is not a correct characterization of his meaning. The judge said that the remedy was "unhinged" from the right being asserted, not that the remedy requested itself was "unhinged" in a pejorative sense. You should be clear in this respect, otherwise it distorts the meaning of the judges words.