User talk:86.3.41.180

November 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Judy Garland, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. '' These two images were both recently uploaded to Wikimedia by the same user. Your effort to replace better images with these two is disruptive.'' HouseOfChange (talk) 17:20, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Judy Garland. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽  ☏(ring-ring)  16:45, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Judy Garland ‎, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Felida97 (talk) 11:36, 20 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Edit warring: Please stop re-adding the same or similar material to Judy Garland:

* Nov. 15 * Nov. 17 * Nov. 19 * Nov. 20
 * Other editors including and  have explained to you that these changes violate MOS. If you continue disruptive editing, you will be blocked

ANI discussion of your editing pattern
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HouseOfChange (talk) 21:19, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Judy Garland. ☾Loriendrew☽  ☏(ring-ring)  20:09, 2 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The same user is now making the same kind of edits from a different IP in Cardiff, I have filed a Checkuser request at Commons for these two IPs and two others that are uploading problematic images for them at Commons. I also filed an ANI report here on these two "Judy Garland fans(?)" but no action was taken. They are wasting a lot of other editors' time. HouseOfChange (talk) 19:49, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: St Peter's R.C. Primary School (July 1)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:St_Peter%27s_R.C._Primary_School Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:34, 1 July 2023 (UTC)