User talk:86.38.215.245

March 2022
Hello, I'm Dizzyflamingo. I noticed that you recently removed content from Pierre Gaspard Chaumette without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  dizzy flamingo  (talk) 02:33, 28 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I remove all gossips and other unnecessary content that just stuffs the article with opinions (that can be numerous and completely unrealistic) and not real facts. 86.38.215.245 (talk) 02:48, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * @86.38.215.245 The text you removed stated "it has been suggested" and then gave a citation for that. The fact that something has been suggested is fact, not gossip. Either way, I'd recommend you include edit summaries, especially when making significant changes to an article.  dizzy flamingo  (talk) 02:54, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Anyone can suggest anything so in such a way whole Wikipedia can be crowded by 7 billion suggestions in each article (also the references can be made to each of similar suggestions). Just stop this practice and clean up articles from gossips, opinions and suggestion by not relevant people. 86.38.215.245 (talk) 03:13, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Again, I would recommend edit summaries explaining why you feel that suggestion is irrelevant to the subject matter, and if controversial, utilizing the article's talk page  dizzy flamingo  (talk) 03:14, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * You do not need to talk foe hundreds of years on the suggestion made by some single man and probably drunken or just simply he was joking. It is Encyclopedia, not a pamphlet. 86.38.215.245 (talk) 03:18, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I can suggest he was a Martian (or reptilian or anything) too and can provide this article with a reference. 86.38.215.245 (talk) 03:15, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

@86.38.215.245 you making a suggestion is not the same as a reliable source discussing what people in general are suggesting. At this point, I am done engaging here. I urge you to take this to the article talk page if you feel strongly about it.  dizzy flamingo  (talk) 03:18, 28 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Science is a battle of opinions that can be completely opposite, but this is not even a science it is a spread of gossips that cannot be even proven or disproved. 86.38.215.245 (talk) 03:22, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Revolutionary Tribunal. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 12:51, 28 March 2022 (UTC)


 * This a fact probably unknown to you since you cannot speak and read Russian and therefore you do not know the history of stalin's purges. There are tonnes of literature on the subject, just you are an ignoramus. 86.38.215.245 (talk) 13:28, 28 March 2022 (UTC)