User talk:86.45.81.107

April 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Stephen Miller (political advisor) are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 18:32, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Questioning the reliability of sources and giving balanced, unbiased information is what an encyclopedia is meant to be about. The article is improved by removing clear political tactics from unreliable sources with an agenda. This is why wikipedia is not, under any circumstances, trusted as a reliable source, and results in a fail if used as a College source. It's also why it must continue to beg for funds. Few outside the echo chamber cannot see through such tactics. It poisons debate and achieves nothing as it only fools occupants of the chamber. However, such criticism will, as always, fall on deaf ears.

But thank you for your three step customer service standardised reply. I understand your frustration, and appreciate your efforts. Your contribution is important. Keep up the good work and remember, only you can make Wikipedia better for all.