User talk:86.5.213.59

January 2022
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Solo: A Star Wars Story, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. --   LuK3      (Talk)   23:51, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Solo: A Star Wars Story, you may be blocked from editing. --   LuK3      (Talk)   01:29, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Justice League (film). DonQuixote (talk) 23:02, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 16:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

March 2022
Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Xi Jinping—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Isabelle 🔔 14:07, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Xi Jinping. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Isabelle 🔔 14:18, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. IceWelder &#91; &#9993; &#93; 10:59, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 12:15, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Dove's talk. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Marcus C. Evans Jr. have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Dove&#39;s talk (talk) 14:35, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Your editing history has been almost entirely disruptive. You have already been blocked twice and are dangerously close to being blocked again. If this becomes necessary, the next block will be a long one. This should be understood as a FINAL WARNING. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:30, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Grand Theft Auto: The Trilogy – The Definitive Edition. – Rhain  ☔ 04:02, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits, including most recently to the article about Sanna Marin. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. — Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 16:28, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

May 2022
This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Prince Andrew, Duke of York, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Such-change47 (talk) 11:06, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully on the page Prince Andrew, Duke of York, but because it appeared to be irrelevant to the article or violated the image use policy, it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 11:07, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 12:30, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

September 2022
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully on the page Sadiq Khan, but because it appeared to be irrelevant to the article or violated the image use policy, it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. there's a note that clearly says not to change the photo without prior talk page discussion Troutfarm27  (Talk) 22:00, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sadiq Khan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 22:04, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Your recent editing history at Sadiq Khan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Liliana (UwU / nya) 22:07, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

April 2023
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Gareth Southgate, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:13, 23 April 2023 (UTC)