User talk:86.6.148.125

The Black Book of Communism
You are currently engaged in an edit war on The Black Book of Communism. Please stop doing this, and seek consensus for your proposed contributions in the Talk page. Newimpartial (talk) 16:26, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * this is the third or fourth time that you undo my editing, this edit war. I quoted all the sources and all of them are directly related to my point, which by the way was uncontroversial. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.6.148.125 (talk) 13:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Reply: Slow and steady wins the race. Be patient and hold strictly to Wikipedia guidelines to correct article bias. I know firsthand that it works. Crossroads -talk- 18:58, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * In other words, be more subtle when you attempt to push your POV so that it's not recognized as such so quickly. Beyond My Ken (talk) 15:27, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Edit warring at The Black Book of Communism
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:54, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello, I'm JBchrch. I noticed that you recently removed content from Juan Huarte de San Juan without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   JBchrch (talk) 18:17, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Woke, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 13:10, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ernst Nolte. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Beyond My Ken (talk) 15:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

September 2021
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Santorio Santorio—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 12:46, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Santorio Santorio—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:24, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Ada Lovelace. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 17:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

March 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 11:32, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Santorio Santorio
Hello, please see my initial edit summary there. To start a discussion about getting the article title changed, use the requested moves process. Graham 87 05:36, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your most recent edits there. Graham 87 15:29, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

edits to Kant and Hegel articles
Hello, I'm PatrickJWelsh. I noticed that you recently made an edit in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.

Hello. This is a message to let you know that you have made an edit summary or a comment that did not appear to be appropriate, civil, or otherwise constructive, and it may have been removed. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Patrick J. Welsh (talk) 01:41, 2 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Also, I don't want to further bombard you with warning templates, but I just noticed that your recent edit replacing gender inclusive language from the lead of the Hegel article was your second attempt to do so, following another on 31 March 2023, flagged as not constructive by another editor above. My guess is that this violates some Wikipedia policy or another. In any case, I'd encourage you to check in on the talk page before editing prominent articles – especially their leads – in the future. Patrick J. Welsh (talk) 18:08, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * As an academic, I can tell you that this so-called "inclusive language" is an imposition that you cannot force on others. Most of my editing was appropriate, so please, stop lambasting me. Thank you. 86.6.148.125 (talk) 11:26, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Pls. see MOS:GNL. Patrick J. Welsh (talk) 14:10, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Sorry this is about qualifications and knowledge: I have a PhD in history of philosophy and Ideas, do you? 86.6.148.125 (talk) 11:27, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I have a lot of respect for expertise. One cannot, however, anonymously appeal to one's own authority on the Internet and expect anyone else to just go along with that. Patrick J. Welsh (talk) 14:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * ready to prove it, just tell me how. 86.6.148.125 (talk) 13:57, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * The best way to demonstrate your expertise on Wikipedia is to cite high-quality reliable sources in support of your claims. If you want to share information about your academic background, I suggest creating an account and including this on your user page. Patrick J. Welsh (talk) 17:16, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024
Hello, I'm Chiswick Chap. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Modern synthesis (20th century) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:50, 18 January 2024 (UTC)