User talk:87.109.169.13

Today,Wikipedia is not a trustworthy knowledge for basics and principles so why you keep on writing data of refractions ,isn't science a pedia for sourcing life independently?Humans all over the world 99% rely on self-dependency not just self esteem.Therfore,people not all memorizing holy books they must be supported even by their enemies,'people who don't believe in their religion,their knowledge,their science,their race and grace,their own believings from oneself to belonging'.I know well that you have someone whom is conducting these series of arrangements to either knowledge and people,'doodes'KP,science and intelligent men,'deeds'SI,matter and factors,'beads'MF,matter and vector,'Pedia'MP.Why do your owners of a little free source of knowledge and science publish poor carbs and neutrants to our children's minds.A paragraph at the end of each article should open a gate or a window to the reader to have a source for living and I'm certainly believe that your scientists of wikipedia regarding can do it. Thank you, Rajaa