User talk:87.110.143.41

December 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Propolis, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Original WP:MEDRS reviews are needed to support any claim of anti-disease activity. Please don't edit war, WP:WAR.'' Zefr (talk) 19:08, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Propolis shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''See the talk page. You have 1) reverted 3 times - an editing violation, 2) used a source which itself used primary research, not WP:MEDRS reviews, 3) disrupted the style of the article, 4) copied directly from the source - this is plagiarism, and 5) have not gained consensus among other editors on the talk page for your point of view, WP:CON. Your behavior is disruptive and you may be blocked from futher editing.'' Zefr (talk) 21:23, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.